Connect with us

Entertainment

Texas lawmaker’s widow calls FBI after special election robocall charges her with murder

New York Times:

The dismissal of the US ambassador is under investigation at ul uliani

Two years ago, Rudy Gi Ulyan finally got something he was looking for in Ukraine. The Trump administration ousted the US ambassador there, saying a woman was obstructing efforts to dig up the Biden family. It was a piro victory. Giuliani’s efforts to oust Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch have not only become the focus of President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial, but have now put Giuliani on a federal criminal investigation into whether he violated lobbying laws, according to knowledgeable people. The case of the “Long” case reached a turning point this week, when FBI agents confiscated phones, computers and hat’s from Manhattan’s home and office in Manhattan. The people said that at least one of the letters of recommendation was looking for evidence related to the role of Yovanovitch և his ambassador. In particular, the federal authorities were expected to try the electronic communication devices about the 2019 ambassador to the “Trump administration officials” ambassador until 2019. Recall April, one of the people added. The verdict was sought by his Ukrainian officials who had a headache with Yovanovitch, including those who at the time were helping Ul Uliani find harmful information about President Biden, then a candidate, and his family. , An important question arises for investigators. Did ul uliani follow Yovanovitch exclusively on behalf of Trump, who was his client at the time? Or was he doing it on behalf of Ukrainian officials who wanted to oust him for their own sake? It is a violation of federal law to lobby on behalf of foreign officials in the United States Government without registering with the Department of Justice, և ul uliani has never done so. Even if the Ukrainians did not pay Giuliani, prosecutors could back down on the theory that they were helping by gathering information about Biden in exchange for his removal. One of Giuliani’s cell phone and computer search warrants made it clear that the possible crimes under investigation included violations of the law, the Foreign Agents Registration Act, according to those aware of it. Giuliani has long denied that he worked for the Ukrainians or that he received any money from them, saying he did not explicitly urge Trump to fire the ambassador. Giuliani’s attempt to oust Yovanovitch was part of a larger effort to attack Biden, linking him to corruption in Ukraine, much of which was played out in public. But intelligence officials have long warned that Ul Uliani’s work in Ukraine has fallen into the trap of Russia’s efforts to spread misinformation about the Biden family in order to weaken Trump’s rival. The FBI has stepped up its warnings about Russian misinformation by 2020. The election, including giving a defense briefing to Ul Uliani, warning him that some of the information he was provoking about the Biden family was contaminated by Russian intelligence efforts to spread misinformation, the man said. The FBI’s defense briefings are given by its counterintelligence officials, separated from the criminal investigation into Ul uliani’s activities. The defense briefing was reported by The Washington Post on Thursday. But the warnings to ul uliani are not surprising. At the end of 2019, high-ranking officials warned Trump that ul-ulian was promoting Russian misinformation, and the intelligence community warned the American public that Moscow’s intelligence services were trying to undermine Biden’s electoral chances by spreading information about his family’s work in Ukraine. On Wednesday, after FBI agents seized his devices, Ul Uliani again denied any wrongdoing. He said the search warrants for the Justice Department showed a “corrupt double standard” that he had accused Democrats, including Biden, of ignoring “blatant crimes”. Asked about the interrogation warrants on Thursday, Biden told NBC’s “Today” show that he “had no idea it was in progress.” He said he had promised not to interfere in any investigation by the Justice Department. Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello, said his client had twice offered to answer prosecutors’ questions, except for questions related to Giuliani’s privileged contacts with the former president. The letters of recommendation do not accuse Uliani of illegality, but they emphasize his legal danger. They note that the judge found that investigators had a reasonable basis to believe that a crime had been committed, that the search would find evidence of that crime. An investigation has been launched into two Soviet-era businessmen who helped Ul Uliani find harmful information about Biden and his son Hunter. At the time, Hunter Biden was on the board of an energy company doing business in Ukraine. In 2019, businessmen in Manhattan, Lev Parnassus and Igor Frumani, were charged with two counts of campaign finance. The trial is set to begin in October. During the investigation of Giuliani, the federal prosecutor’s office focused on his actions against Yovanovitch. Giuliani admitted that he had provided Trump with detailed information about his claim that he was obstructing investigations that could benefit Trump, that Trump had linked him to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. After several aborted attempts to remove him, Yovanovitch was finally recalled as ambassador in late April 2019. It was said that the White House had lost confidence in him. Late Ulyan said in a recent interview in 2019 that he believed that the information provided by the Trump administration had led to the dismissal of Yovanovitch. “You will have to ask them,” he said of Trump officials. “But they relied on it.” He added that he had never explicitly asked to be fired. Prosecutors also investigated Ul Uliani’s relations with Ukrainians who had a conflict with Yovanovitch, according to people familiar with the matter. As ambassador, Yovanovitch aimed to pursue corruption in Ukraine, earning him quite a few enemies. The investigation has nullified one of his opponents, then-Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuri Lutsenko, people said. At least one of the search warrants for Giuliani’s devices mentioned Lutsenko, some of his colleagues, including the one who helped him identify Giuliani. The relationship had the potential to become symbiotic. Lutsenko wanted Yovanovitch ousted, and as the president’s personal advocate, he was to assist Ul Ulian. Ul Uliani wanted to get negative information about Bidens, as the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, Lutsenko would have the authority to announce an investigation into the deal with Hunter Biden with the energy company. Ul uliani saw that Yovanovitch was insufficiently loyal to the president, obstructing investigations. Lutsenko alluded to the quid pro quo in the text messages that were published during the impeachment trial. In March 2019, Lutsenko wrote in a text sent to Parnassus in Russian that he had found evidence that could harm the Bidens. Then he added: “And you can not overthrow even an idiot,” said Yovanovitch, followed by a frown on his face. At the same time, Giuliani was in talks to introduce Lutsenko or his agency, The New York Times reported earlier. Draft conservation agreements demanded that Ul Uliani receive hundreds of thousands of dollars to help the Ukrainian government recover money that it believed was stolen or repatriated abroad. Ul Uliani signed one of the conservation agreements, but he said that he did not take the job in the end, as his representation in Trump could cause a conflict of interest at the same time. When Yovanovitch testified during the Trump impeachment hearing in late 2019, he told lawmakers that he had only minimal contact with Ul Uliani during his years as ambassador. “I do not know Mr. Uliani’s motives for attacking me,” he said. “But the people who got names in the press, who are related to Mr. “Ul Uliani and they may have thought that their personal and financial ambitions were driving our anti-corruption policy in Ukraine.” This article originally appeared in The New York Times. © 2021 New York Times Company:

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *